Deleted tweets show Natalie Harp’s zealous support of Trump on January 6

Vanished Posts Reveal the Extent of a White House Aide’s January 6 Devotion

Goldlaner.com – When Natalie Harp’s X account — the platform formerly known as Twitter — went dark, it took with it more than 150 tweets she had fired off on January 6, 2021, the day a mob stormed the U.S. Capitol. Those now-removed messages, recovered before the account was suspended, paint a vivid picture of a young loyalist who treated the chaotic morning as a stage for unwavering, near-religious allegiance to Donald Trump. The account’s current status is unclear: no one outside the platform or Harp herself can confirm when it was taken down or whether she initiated the deletion.

Who Is Natalie Harp?

Harp, who was 29 at the time of the Capitol breach, had built her public identity around proximity to the Trump orbit. Before entering the White House staff, she hosted a program on One America News Network, and her social-media bio at the time identified her as a member of a Trump “advisory board.” In his second term, she has operated as a close aide to the president, working largely behind the scenes while shaping internal communications and messaging. Neither Harp nor the White House press office responded to requests for comment about her deleted posts.

The pattern of loyalty Harp displayed that January morning is not, by itself, anomalous within the president’s inner circle. Trump has long surrounded himself with staffers who treat questioning as disloyalty. What distinguishes Harp’s archive of posts is the sheer volume and intensity of the language she deployed in real time, often within minutes of events unfolding on the ground in Washington, D.C.

A Morning of Escalation, Tweet by Tweet

As crowds gathered near the White House on the morning of January 6, Harp began relaying messages from members of the Trump family. One declared,

“This movement will never, ever die!”

Another insisted,

“This fight has only just begun.”

She then turned her attention to the demonstrators assembling for the president’s speech, labeling them “patriots” and issuing a challenge to members of Congress to demonstrate

“a fraction of the courage & passion”

displayed by the crowd. Her rallying cry that morning was blunt:

“today we STOP THE STEAL!”

When Rudy Giuliani took the podium and urged the assembled crowd to

“let’s have trial by combat!”

, Harp amplified the line in her own feed. Giuliani’s legal team later characterized the remark as “hyperbolic” and not a literal call for violence, but the tweet had already gone out.

The moment Trump stepped to the microphone, Harp’s posting accelerated. In a single message she repeated

“FIGHT FOR TRUMP!”

a dozen times, appending the declaration

“Today D.C. is TRUMP COUNTRY!”

She then live-tweeted the president’s own words as he spoke:

“We will never give up. We will never concede!”

After the Breach

Once the mob forced its way through the Capitol’s doors, Harp’s feed shifted to damage control. She shared posts insisting the rioters were

“not Trump supporters”

and circulated claims — later shown to be false — that Antifa operatives had infiltrated the crowd. She also relayed Trump’s repeated calls for the rioters to disperse and go home.

Hours later, after Congress was forced to pause the electoral vote count, Harp returned to amplifying Giuliani. She quoted his assertion that the disruption had created

“a few more options particularly with this delay”

and that the president’s legal team was working on

“how we can take advantage of those options,”

punctuating the post with an American flag emoji.

When the House ultimately voted down the Republican objection to counting Arizona’s electoral votes, Harp posted a message that blended religious reassurance with political grievance:

“America may not be America anymore. But God’s still God. Don’t stop believing!!”

Celebrating the Objection

Far from criticizing the lawmakers who sustained the challenge, Harp singled them out for praise. She thanked Representative Jody Hice for being

“a man of his word and the Constitution,”

lauded Marjorie Taylor Greene for her

“courage,”

and described Senator Josh Hawley as

“a true patriot”

who

“refuses to be intimidated out of his duty to the Constitution.”

She extended the same encomium to the six senators who voted to sustain the objections — Ted Cruz, Hawley, Cindy Hyde-Smith, John Kennedy, Roger Marshall, and Tommy Tuberville — calling them

“patriots”

who

“did not waver in the fight for our beloved country & @POTUS.”

The Day After

On January 7, after Trump publicly acknowledged that a new administration would assume office, Harp shared his message that

“our incredible journey is only just beginning.”

Fourteen minutes later, she appended her own declaration:

“We love you, President @realDonaldTrump!”

A Pattern That Preceded January 6

The deleted archive shows that Harp’s embrace of the election-fraud narrative did not spring from the chaos of that single morning. In the weeks before the Capitol riot, she had already posted to her followers:

“We will never give up – for TRUTH is on our side. January 6th is coming!!.”

Days after the November election, she wrote

“WE LOVE YOU! WE LOVE YOU! WE LOVE YOU! x 71 million,”

and on December 14 she declared, in capitals,

“THIS IS A COUP.”

What the Deleted Feed Tells Us

David B. Cohen, a political science professor at the University of Akron who studies the American presidency, offered a pointed assessment of the dynamic Harp’s posts illustrate:

“She has proven to be a totally loyal sycophantic adviser and staffer for him. Trump likes that, he doesn’t like to be questioned. He likes to be revered, and she clearly does that.”

The broader implication is structural. A president who selects aides primarily for their capacity to echo rather than interrogate builds an information environment in which dissent is filtered out before it reaches decision-making. Harp’s January 6 feed — 150-plus posts in a single day, each calibrated to validate, amplify, or defend — functions as a case study in that dynamic. The fact that the account now appears suspended, with no public explanation for its removal, adds a layer of opacity to an episode that already sits at the intersection of presidential loyalty culture, social-media accountability, and the unresolved questions surrounding the January 6 investigation.